The second debate didn’t go as well as we’d hoped. Daniel didn’t really get a chance to get out all of his policies and perspectives. He never mentioned anything about tech companies providing housing for oakland residents, or anything at all around uber. However he did get out some of his policies and did some promotion.

On the other side he did advertise our website, and explain our policy around tech companies and their limitations. He also used one of the organizations in one of his statements to back up his answer on funding. What’s changed is that he wasn’t fidgeting or making faces this time, and he spoke really clearly. He’s made some clear improvements since last time, but still has some improvements to make.